Foma film ISO 200
TraditionalPhotographer.NET
Forum Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
        



Foma film ISO 200 Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted 2/13/2008 6:14:37 PM


lynx

lynx

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 11/2/2008 12:55:09 PM
Posts: 16, Visits: 148
Today I did some B&W with the new to me, Calumet/cambo 45NX I used my emil busch 270mm telar, I beleive its my style of shooting that may have made this come out the way it did: But  honest comments are appreciated very much:

Foma ISO 200 shot at 125 ISO at F44,at 1.30mins processed at 5 mins in 1D-II ilford stock solution was third time use-ing this stock solution  at 70 degrees , and scanned on my Microtech 8700

Thanks folks for your time:

Lauren MacIntosh

  Post Attachments 
Lily-21408.jpg (17 views, 113.48 KB)

Post #720
Posted 2/13/2008 6:36:10 PM


pachyderm

pachyderm

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 8:20:01 PM
Posts: 624, Visits: 2,858
I quite like that image Lauren. It is different, with the light coming from what I would think is an unexpected direction. Thanks for sharing that. Hopefully, some with more knowledge of B&W than I have will also give their comments.

Robert M. Teague

---------------------------------------------
Website: www.visionlandscapes.com
Blog: visionlandscapes.spaces.live.com

"Fujifilm remains true to its heritage and to the acknowledged superior image quality delivered by professional photographic film products." -- Fuji Press Release

An old Hasidic story says we should wear a coat with two pockets in order to receive God's message. In one pocket, the message is: "You are nothing but one of billions of grains of sand in the universe." In the other, the message is: "I made the universe just for you."

Post #721
Posted 2/14/2008 6:48:15 AM


lynx

lynx

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 11/21/2008 5:45:54 PM
Posts: 14, Visits: 101
Nice shot! The highlights look very blown out/over-exposed, but that can just be the scan. If they print that way (wet darkroom print - not inkjet) then you may want to rate this film/developer combo a little higher. It's just really hard to tell for sure from a scan what's causing the highlights to lose detail as one of the drawbacks of digital (whether it be a digital camera, flatbed scanner or dedicated film scanner - drum scanners excepted) is the limited dynamic range.

Joe

please visit: Day of the Dead - the Book & The Noble Beast Press Store

Post #723
Posted 2/14/2008 9:11:04 AM


lynx

lynx

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 11/2/2008 12:55:09 PM
Posts: 16, Visits: 148
Joe: You might be right i do not know at this time, But it was shot against a black background , so to tell if the negative is thin ?  The flower has detail but is it enough is my thoughts as you have stated, to many variables here , darn no simple things [  but i shall not give up I may get something that can be  post and look good yet11

I have added another foto of the same flower before the bottom bud was removed:

thanks lot for your input:

Lauren MacIntosh

  Post Attachments 
otherday-lily.jpg (11 views, 121.68 KB)

Post #725
Posted 2/14/2008 1:05:06 PM


lion

lion

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 11/27/2008 8:08:42 PM
Posts: 126, Visits: 323
The second one almost looks posterized. I think your scanning may need a little tweaking. Do you check the histogram after doing a preview? It took me quite sometime to figure out how to scan b&w negs. Color is much easier.

^^^^^^^^^^^^

Eric Rose

Website:www.ericrose.com
Post #727