﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>TraditionalPhotographer.NET / General Discussion / Photographers  / A couple of film shooters I just read about / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v4.1.4</generator><description>TraditionalPhotographer.NET</description><link>http://www.traditionalphotographer.net/forums/</link><webMaster>admin@traditionalphotographer.net</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:55:28 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>RE: A couple of film shooters I just read about</title><link>http://www.traditionalphotographer.net/forums/Topic1326-15-1.aspx</link><description>[quote][b]Derek Lofgreen (6/30/2008)[/b][hr]I'm always too lazy. That's why I shoot 35mm. :) Seriously, hope you feel better Eric.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;D.[/quote]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;35mm is good too. I've spent the past few days scanning 35mm slides and I'm still amazed at the amount of detail a good old Velvia slide can have.</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:05:14 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>roteague</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: A couple of film shooters I just read about</title><link>http://www.traditionalphotographer.net/forums/Topic1326-15-1.aspx</link><description>I'm always too lazy. That's why I shoot 35mm. :) Seriously, hope you feel better Eric.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;D.</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:35:43 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Derek Lofgreen</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: A couple of film shooters I just read about</title><link>http://www.traditionalphotographer.net/forums/Topic1326-15-1.aspx</link><description>[quote][b]eric rose (6/30/2008)[/b][hr]Due to some nagging health issues I have recently started shooting more 35mm rather than my LF. Must say it sure is fun to get back to basics again.[/quote]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope you are doing ok ... hopefully, nothing more than what we all go through - getting older. 35mm is good, I find it keeps me shooting when I get too lazy to take the LF gear out.</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:55:11 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>roteague</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: A couple of film shooters I just read about</title><link>http://www.traditionalphotographer.net/forums/Topic1326-15-1.aspx</link><description>Due to some nagging health issues I have recently started shooting more 35mm rather than my LF.  Must say it sure is fun to get back to basics again.</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:17:37 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>eric rose</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: A couple of film shooters I just read about</title><link>http://www.traditionalphotographer.net/forums/Topic1326-15-1.aspx</link><description>Thanks Derek,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Like Tom, I've been a fan of Joe Cornish and Jack Dykinga for some years. I was just checking out Randall Hodges' work - quite nice, especially considering he is shooting 35mm. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is always a breath of fresh air to see these photographers, it seems at times like everyone is shooting digital, but then you run into photographers like Randall Hodges and Henry Dallal (that I mentioned a week or so ago), and it is just great. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've already got Cornish and Dykinga on the photographer's list (under Resources), but will add the other two as well.</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:27:19 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>roteague</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: A couple of film shooters I just read about</title><link>http://www.traditionalphotographer.net/forums/Topic1326-15-1.aspx</link><description>[quote][b]Derek Lofgreen (6/24/2008)[/b][hr]Rangefinder magazine had a nature and landscape issue a couple of issues ago and they profiled some folks that still shoot film! I was floored. Usually all that rag does is push the "Canon digital way", sort of gets old after a while. Anyway here are a few links to some exceptional shooters.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://www.randalljhodges.com/newportfolio2.htm&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://www.joecornish.com/&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://inclouds.com/&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://www.dykinga.com/Welcome.html&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Enjoy.&lt;br&gt;D.[/quote]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well, such is the dilemma for magazine publishers these days. Digital photographers want to see digital images. (I'll stop there... this could get very long-winded)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway, I've been a fan of Joe Cornish for some time, and I [i][b]know[/b][/i] I've seek Jack Dykinga's work before. (The site now requires a login, which I don't recall)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really like the Randal Hodges photographs. I had not seen his work before. Shows what you can do with a nice 35mm slide film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;Tom</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 08:10:21 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Toffle</dc:creator></item><item><title>A couple of film shooters I just read about</title><link>http://www.traditionalphotographer.net/forums/Topic1326-15-1.aspx</link><description>Rangefinder magazine had a nature and landscape issue a couple of issues ago and they profiled some folks that still shoot film! I was floored. Usually all that rag does is push the "Canon digital way", sort of gets old after a while. Anyway here are a few links to some exceptional shooters.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://www.randalljhodges.com/newportfolio2.htm&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://www.joecornish.com/&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://inclouds.com/&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://www.dykinga.com/Welcome.html&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Enjoy.&lt;br&gt;D.</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 07:48:42 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Derek Lofgreen</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>