﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>TraditionalPhotographer.NET / General Discussion / Photography News  / Photographer Takes on the Iron Man in Lawsuit / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v4.1.4</generator><description>TraditionalPhotographer.NET</description><link>http://www.traditionalphotographer.net/forums/</link><webMaster>admin@traditionalphotographer.net</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:17:54 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>RE: Photographer Takes on the Iron Man in Lawsuit</title><link>http://www.traditionalphotographer.net/forums/Topic1337-23-1.aspx</link><description>yeah, i wonder if this will hold up too. If it was a movie setup that he took a picture of then...hmmm. It would be like at a wedding where the formal shots are the photographer's setups, and then you have a family member snapping away at the pose before the photographer shoots his/her own setup. Who owns what?</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:00:41 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>mallard67</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Photographer Takes on the Iron Man in Lawsuit</title><link>http://www.traditionalphotographer.net/forums/Topic1337-23-1.aspx</link><description>Lets see if this hold up. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The quote under Adams photo.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Adams says he took the photograph from a parking structure during the making of the movie." &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So my thinking is Adams was not supposed to be in the parking structure so he must have been there against the wishes of the film maker. So Adams made the image illegally.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now he wants his day in court complaining that the film maker, who may or may not have made an image from the same vantage point, violated his rights. Doesn't the film maker have rights here also?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hmm, based on what I read in the article, I would say Adams is one lucky guy if he is not charged with tresspassing or worse.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not a lawyer but if I were on a Jury, Adams would have a tough road to convence me he was wronged.</description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:53:13 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Gary892</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Photographer Takes on the Iron Man in Lawsuit</title><link>http://www.traditionalphotographer.net/forums/Topic1337-23-1.aspx</link><description>Creatives (film makers) ripping of other creatives (photographer). It's like shark infested waters and they are eating their young.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;D.</description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:52:52 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Derek Lofgreen</dc:creator></item><item><title>Photographer Takes on the Iron Man in Lawsuit</title><link>http://www.traditionalphotographer.net/forums/Topic1337-23-1.aspx</link><description>From PDN Online:&lt;P&gt;"Los Angeles photographer claims the makers of movie &lt;I&gt;Iron Man&lt;/I&gt; illegally used one of his photos in the summer blockbuster as part of a mock newspaper front page.&lt;BR clear=none&gt;&lt;BR&gt;...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The photo appears in a scene in which the lead character, Tony Stark, played by &lt;B&gt;Robert Downey Jr.&lt;/B&gt;, reads a newspaper front page that says "Who is the Iron Man?" The photo on the front of the newspaper is nearly identical to the one Adams claims is his, with the only obvious difference being the missing watermark."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.pdnonline.com/pdn/newswire/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003818326"&gt;http://www.pdnonline.com/pdn/newswire/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003818326&lt;/A&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:55:34 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>roteague</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>